References
Place where most of these books, articles, and chapters are located
Go to lecture: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28.




Lecture 1. GENIUS I: DEFINITIONS & MANIFESTATIONS Addison, J. (1983). On genius. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 3-8). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1719)

Albert, R. S. (1976). Toward a behavioral definition of genius. In W. W. Dennis & M. Dennis (Eds.), The intellectually gifted (pp. 309-329). New York: Grune & Stratton. (Original work published 1975)

Albert, R. S., & Runco, M. A. (1999). A history of research on creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 16-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cassandro, V. J., & Simonton, D. K. (2002). Creativity and genius.  In C. L. M. Keyes & J. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp. 163-183). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Cropley, A. J. (1999). Definitions of creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 511-524). San Diego: Academic Press.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325-339). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Galton, F. (1976). The classification of men according to their natural gifts. In W. W. Dennis & M. Dennis (Eds.), The intellectually gifted (pp. 1-12). New York: Grune & Stratton. (Original work published 1869)

Gardner, J. W. (1976). Excellence: Can we be equal and excellent too? In W. W. Dennis & M. Dennis (Eds.), The intellectually gifted (pp. 283-291). New York: Grune & Stratton. (Original work published 1961)

Hardy, G. H. (1983). A mathematician’s apology. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 386-269). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1969)

Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1-13.

Lenneberg, H. (1983). The myth of unappreciated genius. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 40-43). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1980)

Mumford, M. D., & Connelly, M. S. (1999). Leadership. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 139-145). San Diego: Academic Press.

Murray, P. (Ed.). (1989). Genius: The history of an idea. Oxford: Blackwell.

Root-Bernstein, R., Allen, L., Beach, L. Bhadula, R., Fast, J., Hosey, C., Kremkow, B., Lapp, J. Lonc, K., Pawelec, K., Podufaly, A., Russ, C., Tennant, L, Vrtis, E., & Weinlander, S. (2008). Arts foster scientific success: Avocations of Nobel, National Academy, Royal Society, and Sigma Xi members. Journal of the Psychology of Science and Technology, 1, 51-63.

Runco, M., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 92-96.

Shapiro, R. J. (1970). The criterion problem. In P. E. Vernon (Ed.), Creativity (pp. 257-269). Baltimore: Penguin. (Original work published 1968)

Siegler, R. S., & Kotovsky, K. (1992). Two conceptions of giftedness: Shall ever the twain meet? In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (2nd ed., pp. 95-108). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1986)

Simonton, D. K. (2004). Group artistic creativity: Creative clusters and cinematic success in 1,327 feature films. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 1494-1520.

Simonton, D. K. (2012). Creative genius as a personality phenomenon: Definitions, methods, findings, and issues. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 691-706.

Sternberg, R. J. (1988). A three-facet model of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 125-147). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, C. W. (1988). Various approaches to and definitions of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 125-147). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Yamamoto, K. (1976). "Creativity"–A blind man’s report on the elephant. In W. W. Dennis & M. Dennis (Eds.), The intellectually gifted (pp. 283-308). New York: Grune & Stratton. (Original work published 1965)


To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 2. GENIUS II: HISTORIOMETRIC MEASUREMENT Allen, P. A., & Lincoln, A. E. (2004). Critical discourse and the cultural consecration of American films. Social Forces, 82, 871-894.

Ashton, S. V., & Oppenheim, C. (1978). A method of predicting Nobel prizewinners in chemistry. Social Studies of Science, 8, 341-348.

Ballard, E. J., & Suedfeld, P. (1988). Performance ratings of Canadian prime ministers: Individual and situational factors. Political Psychology, 9, 291-302.

Cattell, J. M. (1903). A statistical study of eminent men. Popular Science Monthly, 62, 359-377.

Cole, S., & Cole, J. R. (1971). Measuring the quality of sociological research: Problems in the use of the Science Citation Index. American Sociologist, 6, 23-29.

Farnsworth, P. R. (1969). The social psychology of music (2nd ed.). Ames IW: Iowa State University Press.

Ginsburgh, V., & Weyers, S. A. (2006). Comparing artistic values: The example of movies. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 24, 163-175.

Ginsburgh, V., & Weyers, S. A. (2006). Persistence and fashion in art: Italian Renaissance from Vasari to Berenson and beyond. Poetics, 34, 24-44.

Gray, C. E. (1966). A measurement of creativity in Western civilization. American Anthropologist, 68, 1384-1417

Hart, M. H. (1987). The 100: A ranking of the most influential persons in history. Secaucus, NJ: Citadel.

Ludwig, A. M. (1992). The Creative Achievement Scale. Creativity Research Journal, 5, 109-124.

Maranell, G. M. (1970). The evaluation of presidents: An extension of the Schlesinger polls. Journal of American History, 57, 104-113.

Murray, C. (2003). Human accomplishment: The pursuit of excellence in the arts and sciences, 800 B.C. to 1950. New York: HarperCollins.

Over, R. (1982). The durability of scientific reputation. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 18, 53-61.

Simonton, D. K. (1984). Genius, creativity, and leadership: Historiometric inquiries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Simonton, D. K. (1990). Psychology, science, and history: An introduction to historiometry. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Simonton, D. K. (1996). Presidents’ wives and First Ladies: On achieving eminence within a traditional gender role. Sex Roles, 35, 309-336.

Simonton, D. K. (1997). Latent-variable models of posthumous reputation: A quest for Galton’s G. In D. K. Simonton, Genius and creativity: Selected papers (pp. 125-156). Greenwich, CT: Ablex. (Original work published 1991)

Simonton, D. K. (1997). Leaders of American psychology, 1879-1967: Career development, creative output, and professional achievement. In D. K. Simonton, Genius and creativity: Selected papers (pp. 157-190). Greenwich, CT: Ablex. (Original work published 1992)

Simonton, D. K. (1998). Achieved eminence in minority and majority cultures: Convergence versus divergence in the assessments of  294 African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 804-817.

Simonton, D. K. (1998). Fickle fashion versus immortal fame: Transhistorical assessments of creative products in the opera house. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 198-210.

Simonton, D. K. (1999). Eminence. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 647-657). San Diego: Academic Press.

Simonton, D. K. (2000). Archival data. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 234-235). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; New York: Oxford University Press.

Simonton, D. K. (2007). Historiometrics. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics (Vol. 2, p. 441). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Simonton, D. K. (2003). Qualitative and quantitative analyses of historical data. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 617-640.

Simonton, D. K. (2004). The “Best Actress” paradox: Outstanding feature films versus exceptional performances by women. Sex Roles, 50, 781-794.

Whipple, E. M. (2004). Eminence revisited. History of Psychology, 7, 265-296.

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 3. LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS: PROBLEM SOLVING Amabile, T. M. (1990). Within you, without you: The social psychology of creativity, and beyond. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 61-91). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Finke, R. A. (1997). Mental imagery and visual creativity. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 183-202). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Hayes, J. R. (1989). Cognitive processes in creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.). (1989). Handbook of creativity (pp. 135-145). New York: Plenum.

Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1988). The conditions of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 11-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Consensual assessment. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 347-359). San Diego: Academic Press.

Jay, E. S., & Perkins, D. N. (1997). Problem finding: The search for mechanism. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 257-293). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1999). Logic and reasoning. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 155-161). San Diego: Academic Press.

Klahr, D. (2000). Exploring science: The cognition and development of discovery processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2009). The Aha! moment: The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 210-216.

Mayer, R. E. (1999). Problem solving. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 437-447). San Diego: Academic Press.

Nielsen, B. D., Pickett, C. L., & Simonton, D. K. (2008). Conceptual versus experimental creativity: Which works best on convergent and divergent thinking tasks? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 131-138.

Paulus, P. B., & Nijstand, B. A. (Eds.). (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Perkins, D. N. (2000). The eureka effect: The art and logic of breakthrough thinking. New York: Norton

Runco, M. A., & Sakamoto, S. O. (1999). Experimental studies of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 62-91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sawyer, R. K. (2011). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity: A critical review. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 137-154.

Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (Eds.). (1995). The creative cognition approach. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

Sternberg, J. R., & Davidson, J. E. (1999). Insight. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 57-69). San Diego: Academic Press.

Richards, T. (1999). Brainstorming. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 219-227). San Diego: Academic Press.

Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 189-212). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Vaid, J. (Eds.). (1997). Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Weisberg, R. J. (1988). Problem solving and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 148-176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Relevant articles may often be found in Cognitive Science and Cognitive Psychology.
 

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 4. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: COMPUTER SIMULATION Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Boden, M. A. (1996). Artificial intelligence. San Diego: Academic Press.

Boden, M A. (1999). Computer models of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 351-372). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bradshaw, G. F., Langley, P. W., & Simon, H. A. (1983). Studying scientific discovery by computer simulation. Science, 222, 971-975.

Crevier, D. (1993). AI: The tumultuous history of the search for artificial intelligence. New York: Basic Books.

Dartnall, T. (Ed.). (1994). Artificial intelligence and creativity: An interdisciplinary approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

Gero, J. S., & Maher, M. L. (Eds.). (1993). Modeling creativity and knowledge-based creative design. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Gilhooly, K. J. (1989). Human and machine problem solving. New York: Plenum.

Hsu, F. (2002). Behind Deep Blue: Building the computer that defeated the world chess champion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1988). Freedom and constraint in creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 202-219). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kulkarni, D., & Simon, H. A. (1988). The process of scientific discovery: The strategy of experimentation. Cognitive Science, 12, 139-175.

Langley, P., & Jones, R. (1988). A computational model of scientific insight. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 177-201). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Langley, P., Simon, H. A., Bradshaw, G. L., & Zythow, J. M. (1987). Scientific discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Newborn, M. (1996). Kasparov versus Deep Blue: Computer chess comes of age. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Proctor, T. (1999). Artificial intelligence. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 127-133). San Diego: Academic Press.

Schank, R. C. (1988). Creativity as a mechanical process. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 202-219). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shrager, J., & Langley, P. (Eds.). (1990). Computational models of scientific discovery and theory formation. San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann.

Turner, S. R. (1994). The creative process: A computer model of storytelling and creativity. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Wagman, M. (2000). Scientific discovery processes in humans and computers: Theory and research in psychology and artificial intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.

See also current issues of the journal Artificial Intelligence and, occasionally, Leonardo.

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 5. CONTENT ANALYSIS: SUBJECTIVE & OBJECTIVE Adamopoulos, J. (1982). Analysis of interpersonal structures in literary works of three historical periods. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 157-168.

Aronson, E. (1958). The need for achievement as measured by graphic expression. In J. W. Atkinson (Ed.), Motives in fantasy, action, and society (pp. 249-265). Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.

Cerulo, K. A. (1988). Analyzing cultural products: A new method of measurement. Social Science Research, 17, 317-352.

Derks, P. L. (1989). Pun frequency and popularity of Shakespeare’s plays. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 7, 23-31.

Donley, R. E., & Winter, D. G. (1970). Measuring the motives of public officials at a distance: An exploratory study of American presidents. Behavioral Science, 15, 227-236.

Gottschalk, L. A., Uliana, R., & Gilbert, R. (1988). Presidential candidates and cognitive impairment measured from behavior in campaign debates. Public Administration Review, 48, 613-619.

Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Insch, G. S., Moore, J. E., & Murphy, L. D. (1997). Content analysis in leadership research: Examples, procedures, and suggestions for future use. Leadership Quarterly, 8, 1-25.

McClelland, D. C. (1975). Power: The inner experience. New York: Irvington.

Miller, N. L., Stiles, W. B. (1986). Verbal familiarity in American presidential nomination acceptance speeches and inaugural addresses (1920-1981). Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 72-81.

Ramirez, C. E., & Suedfeld, P. (1988). Nonimmediacy scoring of archival materials: The relationship between Fidel Castro and "Che" Guevara. Political Psychology, 9, 155-164.

Sigelman, L. (2002). Two Reagans? Genre imperatives, ghostwriters, and presidential personality profiling. Political Psychology, 23, 839-851.

Simonton, D. K. (1999). William Shakespeare. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 559-563). San Diego: Academic Press.

Simonton, D. K. (2007). The creative imagination in Picasso’s Guernica sketches: Monotonic improvements or nonmonotonic variants? Creativity Research Journal, 19, 329-344.

Smith, C. P. (Ed.). (1992). Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Stirman, S. W., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2001). Word use in the poetry of suicidal and nonsuicidal poets. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63, 517-522.

Weisberg, R. W. (2004). On structure in the creative process: A quantitative case-study of the creation of Picasso’s Guernica. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 23-54.

Winter, D. G. (2005). Things I’ve learned about personality by studying leaders at a distance. Journal of Personality, 73, 557-584.

Zullow, H. M., Oettingen, G., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1988). Pessimistic explanatory style in the historical record: CAVing LBJ, presidential candidates, and East versus West Berlin. American Psychologist, 43, 673-682.
 

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 6. PSYCHOMETRIC METHODS: IQ TESTS Bachelor, P. A., & Michael, W. B. (1997). The structure-of-intellect model revised. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 155-182). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439-476.

Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1976). The development of intelligence in the child. In W. W. Dennis & M. Dennis (Eds.), The intellectually gifted (pp. 13-16). New York: Grune & Stratton. (Original work published 1908)

Carroll, J. B. (1992). Cognitive abilities: The state of the art. Psychological Science, 3, 266-270.

Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2006). Intellectual competence and intelligent personality: A third way in differential psychology. Review of General Psychology, 10, 251-267.

Chauncy, H., & Hilton, T. L. (1983). Aptitude tests for the highly gifted. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 85-98). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1965)

Dennis, I., & Tapsfield, P. (Eds.). (1996). Human abilities: Their nature and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence re-framed: Multiple intelligences forthe 21st century. New York: Basic Books.

Garlick, D. (2002). Understanding the nature of the general factor of intelligence: The role of individual differences in neural plasticity as an explanatory mechanism. Psychological Review, 109, 116-136.

Gibson, J., & Light, P. (1992). Intelligence among university scientists. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (2nd ed., pp. 109-111). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1967)

Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Harris, J. A. (2004). Measured intelligence, achievement, openness to experience, and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 913-929.

Hollingworth, L. J. (1926). Gifted children. New York: Macmillan.

Hollingworth, L. J. (1942). Children beyond 180 IQ: Origin and development. Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY: World Book.

Humphreys, L. G. (1992). Commentary: What both critics and users of ability tests need to know. Psychological Science, 3, 271-274.

Judge, T. A., Colbert, A. E., & Ilies, R. (2004). Intelligence and leadership: A quantitative review and test of theoretical propositions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 542-552.

Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 86, 148-161.

McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for "intelligence." American Psychologist, 28, 1-14.

Nyborg, H. (Ed.). (2003). The scientific study of general intelligence: Tribute to Arthur R. Jensen. Oxford: Pergamon.

Serebriakoff, V. (1985). MENSA: The society for the highly intelligent. London: Constable.

Simonton, D. K. (2003h). Genius and g. In H. Nyborg (Ed.), The scientific study of general intelligence: Tribute to Arthur R. Jensen (pp. 229-245). Oxford, England: Pergamon.

Solomon, B., Powell, K., & Gardner, H. (1999). Multiple intelligences. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 273-283). San Diego: Academic Press.

Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Intelligence. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 81-88). San Diego: Academic Press.

Sternberg, R. J. (2004). WICS: A theory of wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sternberg, R. J., & O’Hara, L. A. (1999). Creativity and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 251-272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Storfer, M. D. (1990). Intelligence and giftedness: The contributions of heredity and early environment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Additional papers may be found in the journal Intelligence.

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 7. LONTITUDINAL STUDIES: TERMAN’S GIFTED CHILDREN Dudek, S. Z., & Hall, W. B. (1992). Personality consistency: Eminent architects 25 years later. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (2nd ed., pp. 303-314). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1991)

Getzels, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley.

Holahan, C. K., & Sears, R. R. (1995). The gifted group in later maturity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Lubinski, D., Webb, R. M., Morelock, M. J., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Top 1 in 10,000: A 10-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 718-729.

McCrae, R. R., Arenberg, D., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Declines in divergent thinking with age: Cross-sectional, longitudinal, and cross-sequential analyses. Psychology and Aging, 2, 130-136.

Muratori, M.C., Stanley, J.C., Gross, M.U.M., Ng, L., Tao, T., Ng, J., & Tao, B. (2006). Insights from SMPY’s greatest former prodigies: Drs. Terence (“Terry”) Tao and Lenhard (“Lenny”) Ng reflect on their talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 307-324.

Oden, M. H. (1968). The fulfillment of promise: 40-year follow-up of the Terman gifted group. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 77, 3-93.

Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns predict creativity in the arts and sciences: Tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years. Psychological Science, 18, 948-952.

Shurkin, J. N. (1992). Terman’s kids: The groundbreaking study of how the gifted grow up. Boston: Little, Brown.

Stein, M. I., & Heinze, S. J. (1983). A summary of Terman’s Genetic Studies of Genius, Volumes I and III. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 75-84). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1960)

Subotnik, R. F., & Arnold, K. D. (1994). Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Subotnik, R. F., & Arnold, K. D. (1999). Longitudinal studies. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 163-168). San Diego: Academic Press.

Subotnik, R. F., Kassan, L., Summers, E., & Wasser, A. (1994). Genius revisited: High IQ children grown up. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Terman, L. M. (1925). Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Terman, L. M. (1970). Psychological approaches to the study of genius. In P. E. Vernon (Ed.), Creativity (pp. 25-41). Baltimore: Penguin. (Original work published 1947)

Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1947). The gifted child grows up. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1959). The gifted group at mid-life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1976). The gifted child at mid-life. In W. W. Dennis & M. Dennis (Eds.), The intellectually gifted (pp. 209-216). New York: Grune & Stratton. (Original work published 1959)

Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1976). The Terman study of intellectually gifted children. In W. W. Dennis & M. Dennis (Eds.), The intellectually gifted (pp. 51-67). New York: Grune & Stratton. (Original work published 1959)
 

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 8. HISTORIOMETRIC INQUIRIES: COX’S 301 GENIUSES
Bowerman, W. G. (1947). Studies in genius. New York: Philosophical Library.
Cattell, R. B., & Butcher, H. J. (1970). Creativity and personality. In P. E. Vernon (Ed.), Creativity (pp. 312-326). Baltimore: Penguin. (Original work published 1968)

Cox, C. (1926). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Cox, C. M. (1976). A dossier on Charlotte Brontë. In W. W. Dennis & M. Dennis (Eds.), The intellectually gifted (pp. 47-50). New York: Grune & Stratton. (Original work published 1926)

Cox, C. M. (1976). Excerpts from the early writings of geniuses selected and arranged by Lewis M. Terman. In W. W. Dennis & M. Dennis (Eds.), The intellectually gifted (pp. 25-45). New York: Grune & Stratton. (Original work published 1926)

Cox, C. M. (1976). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. In W. W. Dennis & M. Dennis (Eds.), The intellectually gifted (pp. 17-24). New York: Grune & Stratton. (Original work published 1926)

Cox, C. M. (1983). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 46-51). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1926)

Ellis, H. (1926). A study of British genius (rev. ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Simonton, D. K. (1997). Biographical determinants of achieved eminence: A multivariate approach to the Cox data. In D. K. Simonton, Genius and creativity: Selected papers (pp. 79-94).  Greenwich, CT: Ablex. (Original work published 1976)

Simonton, D. K. (1997). Historiometric studies of creative genius. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 3-28). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Simonton, D. K. (1999). Creativity from a historiometric perspective. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 116-136). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Simonton, D. K. (1999). Historiometry. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 815-822). San Diego: Academic Press.

Simonton, D. K. (1999). Significant samples: The psychological study of eminent individuals. Psychological Methods, 4, 425-451.

Simonton, D. K. (2003). Qualitative and quantitative analyses of historical data. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 617-640.

Simonton, D. K. (2006). Presidential IQ, Openness, Intellectual Brilliance, and leadership: Estimates and correlations for 42 US chief executives. Political Psychology, 27, 511-639.

Simonton, D. K. (2009). The “other IQ”: Historiometric assessments of intelligence and related constructs. Review of General Psychology, 13, 315-326.

Simonton, D. K., & Song, A. V. (2009). Eminence, IQ, physical and mental health, and achievement domain: Cox’s 282 geniuses revisited. Psychological Science, 20, 429-434.

Song, A. V., & Simonton, D. K. (2007). Studying personality at a distance: Quantitative methods. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 308-321). New York: Guilford Press.

Terman, L. M. (1917). The intelligence quotient of Francis Galton in childhood. American Journal of Psychology, 28, 209-215.

Thorndike, E. L. (1936). The relations between intellect and morality in rulers. American Journal of Sociology, 42, 321-334.

Walberg, H. S., Rasher, S. P., & Hase, K. (1983). IQ correlates with high eminence. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 52-56). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1978)

Woods, F. A. (1906). Mental and moral heredity in royality. New York: Holt.

White, R. K. (1931). The versatility of genius. Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 460-489.
 

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 9. MATHEMATICAL MODELS: IQ & INFLUENCE Barnett, G. A., Fink, E. L., & Debus, M. B. (1989). A mathematical model of academic citation age. Communication Research, 16, 510-531.

Brannigan, A., & Wanner, R. A. (1983). Historical distributions of multiple discoveries and theories of scientific change. Social Studies of Science, 13, 417-435.

Chung, K. H., & Cox, R. A. K. (1994). A stochastic model of superstardom: An application of the Yule distribution. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 771-775.

Epstein, R. (1990). Generativity theory and creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 116-140). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Epstein, R. (1999). Generativity theory. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 759-766). San Diego: Academic Press.

Findlay, C. S., & Lumsden, C. J. (1988). The creative mind: Toward an evolutionary theory of discovery and innovation. Journal of Biological and Social Structures, 11, 3-55.

Huber, J. C. (2000). A statistical analysis of special cases of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34, 203-225.

Lowe, J. W. G., & Lowe, E. D. (1982). Cultural pattern and process: A study of stylistic change in womens dress. American Anthropologist, 84, 521-544.

Mansfield, E. (1961). Technical change and the rate of imitation. Econometrica, 29, 741-766.

Marchetti, C. (1980). Society as a learning system: Discovery, invention, and innovation cycles. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 18, 267-282.

Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Price, D. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.

Schilling, M. A. (2005). A “small-world” network model of cognitive insight. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 131-154.

Sheldon, J. C. (1980). A cybernetic theory of physical science professions: The causes of periodic normal and revolutionary science between 1000 and 1870 A.D. Scientometrics, 2, 147-167.

Simonton, D. K. (1984). Creative productivity and age: A mathematical model based on a two-step cognitive process. Developmental Review, 4, 77-111.

Simonton, D. K. (1985). Intelligence and personal influence in groups: Four nonlinear models. Psychological Review, 92, 532-547.

Simonton, D. K. (1986). Stochastic models of multiple discovery. Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, B 36, 138-141.

Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66-89.

Simonton, D. K. (1999). Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. Psychological Review, 106, 435-457.

Simonton, D. K. (2010b). Creativity as blind-variation and selective-retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity. Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 156-179.

Taagepera, R. (1979). People, skills, and resources: An interaction model for world population growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 13, 13-30.

Young, D. A. (1984). A spatiotemporal model of civilization. Behavioral Science, 29, 111-129.

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 10. CREATIVITY TESTS: CQ Barron, F. (1988). Putting creativity to work. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 76-98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Baier, J. (1999). Gender differences. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 753-758). San Diego: Academic Press.

Brown, R. T. (1989). Creativity: What are we to measure? In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.). (1989). Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-32). New York: Plenum.

Carson, S., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 37-50.

Crammond, B. (1994). The Torrance tests of creative thinking: From design through establishment of predictive validity. In R. F. Subotnik & K. D. Arnold(Eds.), Beyond Terman (pp. 229-254). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Diakidoy, I.-A. N., & Spanoudis, G. (2002). Domain specificity in creativity testing: A comparison of performance on a general divergent-thinking test and a parallel, content-specific test. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 41-61.

Guilford, J. P. (1970). Traits of creativity. In P. E. Vernon (Ed.), Creativity (pp. 167-188). Baltimore: Penguin. (Original work published 1959)

Hocevar, D., & Bachelor, P. (1989). A taxonomy and critique of measurents used in the study of creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.). (1989). Handbook of creativity (pp. 53-75). New York: Plenum.

Keating, D. P. (1983). The creative potential of mathematically precocious boys. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 128-138). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1976)

Michael, W. B. (1999). Guilford’s view. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 785-797). San Diego: Academic Press.

Nicholls, J. G. (1983). Creativity in the person who will never produce anything original or useful. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 265-279). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1972)

O’Quin, K., & Derks, P. (1997). Humor and creativity: A review of the empirical literature. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 227-256). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Plucker, J. A., & Makel, M. C. (2010). Assessment of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 48-73). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Runco, M. (2010). Divergent thinking, creativity, and ideation. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 413-446). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Simonton, D. K. (2002). Creativity. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), The handbook of positive psychology  (pp. 189-201). New York: Oxford University Press.

Simonton, D. K. (2003). Creativity assessment. In R. Fernández-Ballesteros (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychological assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 276-280). London: Sage Publications.

Smith, G. J. W., & Amnér, G. (1997). Creativity and perception. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 67-82). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 43-75). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wallach, M. A. (1983). What do tests tell us about talents? In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 99-113). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1977)

Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1970). A new look at the creativity-intelligence distinction. In P. E. Vernon (Ed.), Creativity (pp. 235-256). Baltimore: Penguin. (Original work published 1965)
 

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 11. PERSONALITY: INTERVIEW & ASSESSMENT Albert, R. S. (1983). Exceptional creativity and achievement. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 19-35). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1980)

Bachtold, L. M., & Werner, E. E. (1983). Creative psychologists: Gifted women. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 331-344). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1970)

Baron, F. (1970). The disposition towards originality. In P. E. Vernon (Ed.), Creativity (pp. 273-288). Baltimore: Penguin. (Original work published 1955)

Barron, F. (1983). Creative writers. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 302-310). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1968)

Dowd, E. T. (1989). The self and creativity: Several constructs in search of a theory. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.). (1989). Handbook of creativity (pp. 211-232). New York: Plenum.

Eiduson, B. T. (1962). Scientists: Their psychological world. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290-309.

Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality and artistic and scientific creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 273-296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Feist, G. J., & Barron, F. X. (2003). Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: Intellect, potential, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 62-88.

Helson, R. (1983). Creative mathematicians. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 311-330). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1980)

Helson, R. (1999). Institute of Personality Assessment and Research. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 71-79). San Diego: Academic Press.

Helson, R. (1999). Personality. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 361-371). San Diego: Academic Press.

MacKinnon, D. W. (1983). The highly effective individual. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 114-127). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1960)

MacKinnon, D. W. (1970). The personality correlates of creativity: A study of American architects. In P. E. Vernon (Ed.), Creativity (pp. 289-311). Baltimore: Penguin. (Original work published 1962)

Martindale, C. (1989). Personality, situation, and creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.). (1989). Handbook of creativity (pp. 211-232). New York: Plenum.

Roe, A. (1953). The making of a scientist. New York: Dodd, Mead.

Roe, A. (1976). A psychologist examines 64 eminent scientists. In W. W. Dennis & M. Dennis (Eds.), The intellectually gifted (pp. 217-223). New York: Grune & Stratton. (Original work published 1952)

Rushton, J. P., Murray, H. G., & Paunonen, S. V. (1992). Personality, research creativity, and teaching effectiveness. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (2nd ed., pp. 281-301). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1983)

Simonton, D. K. (2009). Varieties of (scientific) creativity: A hierarchical model of disposition, development, and achievement. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 441-452.

Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific elite. New York: Free Press.
 

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 12. COGNITION: INTEGRATIVE COMPLEXITY Gruenfeld, D. H., & Preston, J. (2000). Upending the status quo: Cognitive complexity in U.S. Supreme Court Justices who overturn legal precedent. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1013-1022.

Porter, C. A., & Suedfeld, P. (1981). Integrative complexity in the correspondence of literary figures: Effects of personal and societal stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 321-330.

Suedfeld, P., & Bluck, S. (1988). Changes in integrative complexity prior to surprise attacks. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 32, 626-635.

Suedfeld, P., & Guttieri, K., & Tetlock, P. E. (2003). Assessing integrative complexity at a distance: Archival analyses of thinking and decision making. In J. M. Post (Ed.), The psychological assessment of political leaders: With profiles of Saddam Hussein and Bill Clinton (pp. 246-270). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Suedfeld, P., & Leighton, D. C. (2002). Early communications in the war against terrorism: An integrative complexity analysis. Political Psychology, 23, 585-599.

Suedfeld, P., & Piedrahita, L. E. (1984). Intimations of mortality: Integrative simplification as a predictor of death. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 848-852.

Suedfeld, P. (2010). The cognitive processing of politics and politicians: Archival studies of conceptual and integrative complexity. Journal of Personality, 78, 1669-1702.

Tetlock, P. E. (1981). Personality and isolationism: Content analysis of senatorial speeches. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 737-743.

Tetlock, P. E. (1981). Pre- to postelection shifts in presidential rhetoric: Impression management or cognitive adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 207-212.

Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Cognitive style and political ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 118-126.

Tetlock, P. E. (1984). Cognitive style and political belief systems in the British House of Commons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 365-375.

Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Integrative complexity of American and Soviet foreign policy rhetoric: A time-series analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1565-1585.

Tetlock, P. E., Bernzweig, J., & Gallant, J. L. (1985). Supreme Court decision making: Cognitive style as a predictor of ideological consistency of voting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1227-1239.

Tetlock, P. E., & Boettger, R. (1989). Cognitive and rhetorical styles of traditionalist and reformist Soviet politicians: A content analysis study. Political Psychology, 10, 209-232.

Tetlock, P. E., Hannum, K. A., & Micheletti, P. M. (1984). Stability and change in the complexity of senatorial debate: Testing the cognitive versus rhetorical style hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 979-990.

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 13. MOTIVATION: ACHIEVEMENT, POWER, & AFFILIATION Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.

Bradburn, N. M., & Berlew, D. E. (1961). Need for achievement and English economic growth. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 10, 8-20.

Collins, M. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Motivation and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 297-312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cortés, J. B. (1960). The achievement motive in the Spanish economy between the 13th and 18th centuries. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 9, 144-163.

deCharms, R., & Moeller, G. H. (1962). Values expressed in American children’s readers: 1800-1950. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64, 136-142.

Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). GRIT: Perseverence and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1087-1101.

Ferguson, M. R., & Barth, J. (2002). Governors in the legislative arena: The importance of personality in shaping success. Political Psychology, 23, 787-808,

Finison, L. J. (1976). The application of McClelland’s national development model to recent data. Journal of Social Psychology, 98, 55-59.

Fodor, E. M. (1990). The power motive and creativity of solutions to an engineering problem. Journal of Research in Personality, 24, 338-354.

Frey, R. S. (1984). Does n-Achievement cause economic development? A cross-lagged panel analysis of the McClelland thesis. Journal of Social Psychology, 122, 67-70.

Mazur, A., & Rosa, E. (1977). An empirical test of McClelland’s "Achieving Society" theory. Social Forces, 55, 769-774.

McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. New York: Van Nostrand.

Winter, D. G. (1973). The power motive. New York: Free Press.

Winter, D. G. (1980). An exploratory study of the motives of southern African political leaders measured at a distance. Political Psychology, 2, 75-85.

Winter, D. G. (2003). Measuring the motives of political actors at a distance. In J. M. Post (Ed.), The psychological assessment of political leaders: With profiles of Saddam Hussein and Bill Clinton (pp. 153-177). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Winter, D. G., & Carlson, D. G. (1988). Using motive scores in the psychobiographical study of an individual: The case of Richard Nixon. Journal of Personality, 56, 75-103.

Winter, D. G., & Stewart, A. S. (1977). Content analysis as a technique for assessing political leaders. In M. G. Hermann (Ed.), The psychological examination of political leaders (pp. 27-61). New York: Free Press.

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 14. MADNESS VS. MENTAL HEALTH Becker, G. (1983). The mad genius controversy. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 36-39). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1978)

Carson, S. H. (2011). Creativity and psychopathology: A shared vulnerability model. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56, 144-153.

Carson, S., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 499-506.

Claridge, G. (1992). Great wits and madness. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (2nd ed., pp. 329-350). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1990)

Durrenberger, S. D. (1999). Mad genius controversy. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 169-177). San Diego: Academic Press.

Eisenman, R. (1997). Mental illness, deviance, and creativity. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 295-311). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Eysenck, H. J. (1997). Creativity and personality. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 41-66). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Ghadirian, A.-M., Gregoire, P., & Kosmidis, H. (2001). Creativity and the evolution of psychopathologies. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 145-148

Guastello, S. J., Guastello, D. D., & Hanson, C. A. (2004). Creativity, mood disorders, and emotional intelligence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38, 260-281.

Jamison, K. R. (1992). Mood disorders and patterns of creativity in British writers and artists. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (2nd ed., pp. 351-356). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1989)

Kaufman, J. C. (2000-2001). Genius, lunatics and poets: Mental illness in prize-winning authors. Imagination, Cognition & Personality, 20, 305-314.

Kaufman, J. C. (2001). The Sylvia Plath effect: Mental illness in eminent creative writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 37-50.

Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2002). I bask in dreams of suicide: Mental illness, poetry, and women. Review of General Psychology, 6, 271-286.

Kaufman, J. C., & Sexton, J. D. (2006). Why doesn't the writing cure help poets? Review of General Psychology, 10, 268-282.

Ko, Y., & Kim, J. (2008). Scientific geniuses’ psychopathology as a moderator in the relation between creative contribution types and eminence. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 251- 261.

Lester, D. (1999). Suicide. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 585-589). San Diego: Academic Press.

Ludwig, A. M. (1995). The price of greatness: Resolving the creativity and madness controversy. New York: Guilford Press.

Nettle, D. (2006). Schizotypy and mental health amongst poets, visual artists, and mathematicians. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 876-890.

Pritzker, S. R. (1999). Alcohol and creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 53-57). San Diego: Academic Press.

Prentky, R. (1989). Creativity and psychopathology: Gamboling at the seat of madness. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.). (1989). Handbook of creativity (pp. 243-269). New York: Plenum.

Richards, R. (1999). Affective disorders. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 31-43). San Diego: Academic Press.

Richards, R. (1999). Five-part typology. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 717-723). San Diego: Academic Press.

Rogers, C. R. (1970). Towards a theory of creativity. In P. E. Vernon (Ed.), Creativity (pp. 137-151). Baltimore: Penguin. (Original work published 1954)

Rothenberg, A. (1990). Creativity and madness: New findings and old stereotypes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Runco, M. A., & Richards, R. (Eds.). (1997). Eminent creativity, everyday creativity, and health. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.

Santosa, C. M., Strong, C. M., Nowakowska, C., Wang, P. W., Rennicke, C. M., & Ketter, T. A. (2007). Enhanced creativity in bipolar disorder patients: A controlled study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 100, 31-39.

Schlesinger, J. (2009). Creative mythconceptions: A closer look at the evidence for the “mad genius” hypothesis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 62–72.

Schuldberg, D., & Sass, L. A. (1999). Schizophrenia. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 501-514). San Diego: Academic Press.

Simonton, D. K. (1998). Mad King George: The impact of personal and political stress on mental and physical health. Journal of Personality, 66, 443-466.

Simonton, D. K. (2010). So you want to become a creative genius? You must be crazy! In D. Cropley, J. Kaufman, A. Cropley, & M. Runco (Eds.), The dark side of creativity (pp. 218-234). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Verhaeghen, P., Joorman, J., & Khan, R. (2005). Why we sing the blues: The relation between self-reflective rumination, mood, and creativity. Emotion, 5, 226-232.

Weinstein, S., & Graves, R. E. (2002). Are creativity and schizotypy products of a right hemisphere bias? Brain & Cognition, 49, 138-151.

Woody, E., & Claridge, G. (1983). Psychoticism and creativity. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 347-357). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1977)

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 15. AGE & ACHIEVEMENT: LONGITUDINAL CHANGES Adams-Price, C. E. (Ed.). (1998). Creativity and successful aging: Theoretical and empirical approaches. New York: Springer.

Cole, S. (1979). Age and scientific performance. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 958-977.

Dennis, W. (1954). Predicting scientific productivity in later maturity from records of earlier decades. Journal of Gerontology, 9, 465-467.

Dennis, W. (1966). Creative productivity between the ages of 20 and 80 years. Journal of Gerontology, 21, 1-8.

Dennis, W. (1976). Creative productivity between the ages of 20 and 80 years. In W. W. Dennis & M. Dennis (Eds.), The intellectually gifted (pp. 225-238). New York: Grune & Stratton. (Original work published 1966)

Diamond, A. M., Jr. (1980). Age and the acceptance of cliometrics. Journal of Economic History, 40, 838-841.

Galenson, D. W. (2005). Old masters and young geniuses: The two life cycles of artistic creativity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Hass, R. W., & Weisberg, R. W. (2009). Career development in two seminal American songwriters: A test of the equal odds rule. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 183-190.

Hull, D. L., Tessner, P. D., & Diamond, A. M. (1978). Planck’s principle: Do younger scientists accept new scientific ideas with greater alacrity than older scientists? Science, 202, 717-723.

Jones, B. F., & Weinberg, B. A. (2011). Age dynamics in scientific creativity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1102895108

Kanazawa, S. (2003). Why productivity fades with age: The crime-genius connection. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 257-272.

Kaufman, J. C., & Gentile, C. A. (2002). The will, the wit, the judgement: The importance of an early start in productive and successful creative writing. High Ability Studies, 13, 115-123.

Kozbelt, A. (2008). Longitudinal hit ratios of classical composers: Reconciling “Darwinian” and expertise acquisition perspectives on lifespan creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 221-235.

Kozbelt, A. (2008). One-hit wonders in classical music: Evidence and (partial) explanations for an early career peak. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 179-195.

Lehman, H. C. (1953). Age and achievement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Levy, B., & Langer, E. (1999). Aging. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 45-52). San Diego: Academic Press.

Lindauer, M. S. (1999). Old age style. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 311-318). San Diego: Academic Press.

Lindauer, M. S. (1993). The span of creativity among long-lived historical artists. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 231-239.

Lindauer, M. S. (2003). Aging, creativity, and art: A positive perspective on late-life development. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

Manniche, E., & Falk, G. (1957). Age and the Nobel prize. Behavioral Science, 2, 301-307.

McCann, S. J. H. (2001). The precocity-longevity hypothesis: Earlier peaks in career achievement predict shorter lives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1429-1439.

McCrae, R. R. (1999). Consistency of creativity across the life span. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 361-366). San Diego: Academic Press.

Root-Bernstein, R. (1999). Productivity and age. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 457-463). San Diego: Academic Press.

Roring, R. W., & Charness, N. (2007). A multilevel model analysis of expertise in chess across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 22, 291-299.

Simonton, D. K. (1988). Age and outstanding achievement: What do we know after a century of research? Psychological Bulletin, 104, 251-267.

Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66-89.

Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity, age, and stress: A biographical time-series analysis of 10 classical composers. In D. K. Simonton, Genius and creativity: Selected papers (pp. 191-216). Greenwich, CT: Ablex. (Original work published 1977)

Simonton, D. K. (1997). The swan-song phenomenon: Last-works effects for 172 classical composers. In D. K. Simonton, Genius and creativity: Selected papers (pp. 217-230). Greenwich, CT: Ablex. (Original work published 1989)

Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creative development as acquired expertise: Theoretical issues and an empirical test. Developmental Review, 20, 283-318.

Simonton, D. K. (2002). Creativity. In D. J. Ekerdt (Ed.), Encyclopedia of aging (pp. 290-293).  New York: Macmillan Reference.

Simonton, D. K. (2007). Achievement. In J. E. Birren (Ed.), Encyclopedia of gerontology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 20-29). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Simonton, D. K. (2007). Cinema composers: Career trajectories for creative productivity in film music. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 160-169.

Simonton, D. K. (2007). Creative life cycles in literature: Poets versus novelists or conceptualists versus experimentalists? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 133-139.

Stroebe, W. (2000). The graying of academia: Will it reduce scientific productivity? American Psychologist, 65, 660-673.

Wray, K. B. (2003). Is science really a young man’s game? Social Studies of Science, 33, 137-149.

Wray, K. B. (2004). An examination of the contributions of young scientists in new fields. Scientometrics, 61, 117-128.

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 16. LIFETIME OUTPUT: INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Cole, J., & Cole, S. (1972). The Ortega hypothesis. Science, 178, 368-375.

Davis, R. A. (1987). Creativity in neurological publications. Neurosurgery, 20, 652-663

Dennis, W. (1954). Bibliographies of eminent scientists. Scientific Monthly, 79, 180-183.

Dennis, W. (1954). Predicting scientific productivity in later maturity from records of earlier decades. Journal of Gerontology, 9, 465-467.

Dennis, W. (1954). Productivity among American psychologists. American Psychologist, 9, 191-194.

Dennis, W. (1955). Variations in productivity among creative workers. Scientific Monthly, 80, 277-278.

Feist, G. J. (1997). Quantity, quality, and depth of research as influences on scientific eminence: Is quantity most important? Creativity Research Journal, 10, 325-335.

Huber, J. C. (2000). A statistical analysis of special cases of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34, 203-225.

Kyvik, S. (1990). Motherhood and scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 20, 149-160.

Lee, J. D., Vicente, K. J., Cassano, A., & Shearer, A. (2003). Can scientific impact be judged prospectively? A bibliometric test of Simonton’s model of creative productivity. Scientometrics, 56, 223-232.

Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16, 317-323.

Price, D. (1963). Big science, little science. New York: Columbia University Press.

Root-Bernstein, R. S., Bernstein, M., & Garnier, H. (1993). Identification of scientists making long-term, high-impact contributions, with notes on their methods of working. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 329-343.

Root-Bernstein, R. S., Bernstein, M., & Garnier, H. (1995). Correlations between avocations, scientific style, work habits, and professional impact of scientists. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 115-137.

Rushton, J. P., Murray, H. G., & Paunonen, S. V. (1987). Personality characteristics associated with high research productivity. In D. N. Jackson & J. P. Rushton (Eds.), Scientific excellence: Origins and assessment (pp. 129-148). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Shockley, W. (1957). On the statistics of individual variations of productivity in research laboratories. Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers, 45, 279-290.

Simonton, D. K. (1977). Eminence, creativity, and geographic marginality: A recursive structural equation model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 805-816.

Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66-89.

Simonton, D. K. (1997). Emergence and realization of genius: The lives and works of 120 classical composers. In D. K. Simonton, Genius and creativity: Selected papers (pp. 95-124). Greenwich, CT: Ablex. (Original work published 1991)

Simonton, D. K. (1997). Career landmarks in science: Individual differences and interdisciplinary contrasts. In D. K. Simonton, Genius and creativity: Selected papers (pp. 231-264). Greenwich, CT: Ablex. (Original work published 1991)

Simonton, D. K. (1999). Matthew effects. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 185-192). San Diego: Academic Press.

Walberg, H. J., & Arian, G. (1999). Distribution of creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 573-576). San Diego: Academic Press.

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 17. EXPERIMENTAL AESTHETICS Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997-1013.

Berlyne, D. E. (Ed.). (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

Berlyne, D. E. (1976). The new experimental aesthetics and the problem of classifying works of art. Scientific Aesthetics/Sciences de l’Art, 1, 85-106.

Boselie, R. (1992). The Golden Section has no special aesthetic attractivity! Empirical Studies of the Arts, 10, 1-18.

Cupchik, G. C. (1986). A decade after Berlyne: New directions in experimental aesthetics. Poetics, 15, 345-369.

Day, H. I. (Ed.). (1981). Advances in intrinsic motivation and aesthetics. New York: Plenum.

Francès, R. (1976). Comparative effects of six collative variables on interest and preference in adults of different educational levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 62-79.

Heyduk, R. G. (1975). Rated preference for musical compositions as it relates to complexity and exposure frequency. Perception and Psychophysics, 17, 84-91.

Kammann, R. (1966). Verbal complexity and preferences in poetry. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 536-540.

Konecni, V. J. (2005). The "golden section" as aesthetic idea and empirical fact. Visual Arts Research, 30, 75-86.

Karno, M., & Konecni, V. J. (1992). The effects of structural interventions in the first movement of Mozart’s Symphony in G Minor K. 550 on aesthetic preference. Music Perception, 10, 63-72.

McManus, I. C., Cheema, B., & Stoker, J. (1993). The aesthetics of composition: A study of Mondrian. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 11, 83-94.

Martindale, A. E., & Martindale, C. (1988). Metaphorical equivalence of elements and temperaments: Empirical studies of Bachelard’s theory of imagination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 836-848.

Martindale, C., & Moore, K. (1989). Relationship of musical preference to collative, ecological, and psychophysical variables. Music Perception, 6, 431-446.

Steck, L., & Machotka, P. (1975). Preference for musical complexity: Effects of context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 104, 170-174.

Vitz, P. C. (1964). Preferences for rates of information presented by sequences of tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 176-183.

See also articles in Empirical Studies of the Arts and the now-defunct Scientific Aesthetics/Sciences de l’Art, as well as Leonardo and Music Perception.

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 18. COMPUTER ANALYSIS OF MASTERWORKS Brook, B. S. (1969). Style and content analysis in music: The simplified "Plaine and Easie Code." In G. Gerbner, O. R. Holsti, K. Krippendorff, W. J. Paisley, and P. J. Stone (Eds.), The analysis of communication content (pp. 287-296). New York: Wiley.

Holmes, D. (1994). Authorship attribution. Computers and the Humanities, 10, 111-127.

Kozbelt, A., & Burger-Pianko, Z. (2007).Words, music, and other measures: Predicting the repertoire popularity of 597 Schubert lieder. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 191-203.

Longuet-Higgins, H. C. (1987). Mental processes: Studies in cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

Martindale, C. (1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic styles. New York: Basic Books.

Paisley, W. J. (1964). Identifying the unknown communicator in painting, literature and music: The significance of minor encoding habits. Journal of Communication, 14, 219-237.

Simonton, D. K. (1980). Thematic fame and melodic originality: A multivariate computer-content analysis. Journal of Personality, 48, 206-219.

Simonton, D. K. (1984). Melodic structure and note transition probabilities: A content analysis of 15,618 classical themes. Psychology of Music, 12, 3-16.

Simonton, D. K. (1986). Aesthetic success in classical music: A computer analysis of 1935 compositions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 4, 1-17.

Simonton, D. K. (1987). Musical aesthetics and creativity in Beethoven: A computer analysis of 105 compositions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 5, 87-104.

Simonton, D. K. (1989). Shakespeare’s sonnets: A case of and for single-case historiometry. Journal of Personality, 57, 695-721.

Simonton, D. K. (1994). Computer content analysis of melodic structure: Classical composers and their compositions. Psychology of Music, 22, 31-43.

Simonton, D. K. (1995). Drawing inferences from symphonic programs: Musical attributes versus listener attributions. Music Perception, 12, 307-322.

Simonton, D. K. (1997). Thematic fame, melodic originality, and musical zeitgeist: A biographical and transhistorical content analysis. In D. K. Simonton, Genius and creativity: Selected papers (pp. 263-282). Greenwich, CT: Ablex. (Original work published 1980)

Simonton, D. K. (1997). The swan-song phenomenon: Last-works effects for 172 classical composers. In D. K. Simonton, Genius and creativity: Selected papers (pp. 217-230). Greenwich, CT: Ablex. (Original work published 1989)

Simonton, D. K. (1997). Lexical choices and aesthetic success: A computer content analysis of 154 Shakespeare sonnets. In D. K. Simonton, Genius and creativity: Selected papers (pp. 283-306). Greenwich, CT: Ablex. (Original work published 1990)

Simonton, D. K. (2001). Emotion and composition in classical music: Historiometric perspectives. In P. Juslin & J. Sloboda (Eds.), Music and emotion: Theory and research (pp. 205-222). New York: Oxford University Press.

Simonton, D. K. (2004). Group artistic creativity: Creative clusters and cinematic success in 1,327 feature films. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 1494-1520.

Simonton, D. K., Taylor, K., & Cassandro, V. (1998). The creative genius of William Shakespeare: Historiometric analyses of his plays and sonnets. In A. Steptoe (Ed.), Genius and the mind: Studies of creativity and temperament in the historical record (pp. 167-192). New York: Oxford University Press.

See also articles found on occasion in Computers and the Humanities, Psychology of Music, Psychomusicology, Journal of Research in Music Education, Poetics, and Empirical Studies of the Arts.

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 19. DEVELOPMENT I: CHILD PRODIGIES & THE GIFTED Albert, R. S. (1983). The concept of genius and its implications for the study of creativity and giftedness. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 6-18). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1969)

Albert, R. S. (1992). A developmental theory of eminence. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (2nd ed., pp. 3-18). Oxford: Pergamon.

Campitelli, G., & Gobet, F. (2011). Deliberate practice: Necessary but not sufficient. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 280-285.

Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. C. (1999). Expertise. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 695-707). San Diego: Academic Press.

Feldhusen, J. F. (1999). Giftedness and creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 773-777). San Diego: Academic Press.

Feldhusen, J. F. (1999). Talent and creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 623-627). San Diego: Academic Press.

Fitzgerald, M. (2002). Asperger's disorder and mathematicians of genius. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 32, 59-60.

Friedman, R. C., & Rogers, K. B. (Eds.). (1998). Talent in context: Historical and social perspectives on giftedness. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1970). The highly intelligent and the highly creative adolescent. In P. E. Vernon (Ed.), Creativity (pp. 189-202). Baltimore: Penguin. (Original work published 1963)

Havighurst, R. J. (1976). Conditions productive of superior children. In W. W. Dennis & M. Dennis (Eds.), The intellectually gifted (pp. 251-261). New York: Grune & Stratton. (Original work published 1961)

Hermelin, B. (2001). Bright splinters of the mind: A personal story of research with autistic savants. Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.

Hollingworth, L. S. (1976). The development of personality in highly intelligent children. In W. W. Dennis & M. Dennis (Eds.), The intellectually gifted (pp. 89-98). New York: Grune & Stratton. (Original work published 1942)

Howard, R. W. (2011). Does high-level intellectual performance depend on practice alone? Debunking the Polgar sisters case. Cognitive Development, 26, 196-202.

Ilies, R., Gerhardt, M. W., & Le, H. (2004). Individual differences in leadership emergence: Integrating meta-analytic findings and behavioral genetics estimates. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 207-219.

Kaufman, S. B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Ten years to expertise, many more to greatness: An investigation of modern writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 114-124.

Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2000). States of excellence. American Psychologist, 55, 137-150.

Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., Shea, D. L., Eftekhari-Sanjani, H., & Halvorson, M. B. J. (2001). Men and women at promise for scientific excellence: Similarity not dissimilarity. Psychological Science, 12, 309-317.

Howe, M. J. A. (1999). Prodigies and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 431-448). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Miller, L. K. (1999). The Savant Syndrome: Intellectual impairment and exceptional skill. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 31-46.

Morelock, M. J., & Feldman, D. H. (1999). Prodigies. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 449-456). San Diego: Academic Press.

Pressey, S. L. (1976). Concerning the nature and nurture of genius. In W. W. Dennis & M. Dennis (Eds.), The intellectually gifted (pp. 251-261). New York: Grune & Stratton. (Original work published 1955)

Selfe, L. (2011). Nadia revisited: A longitudinal study of an autistic savant. New York: Psychology Press.

Simonton, D. K. (2000). Genius and giftedness:  Same or different?  In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 111-121). Terrytown, NY: Pergamon.

Simonton, D. K. (2001). Talent development as a multidimensional, multiplicative, and dynamic process. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 39-43.

Simonton, D. K. (2005). Giftedness and genetics: The emergenic-epigenetic model and its implications. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 270-286.

Simonton, D. K. (2005). Putting the gift back into giftedness: The genetics of talent development. Gifted and Talented International, 21, 15-18.

Thioux, M., Stark, D. E., Klaiman, C., & Schultz, R. T. (2006). The day of the week when you were born in 700 ms: Calendar computation in an autistic savant. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1155-1168.

Treffert, D. A. (2010). Islands of genius: The bountiful mind of the autistic, acquired, and sudden savant. London, England: Jessica Kingsley.

Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2005). Creativity and occupational accomplishments among intellectually precocious youths: An age 13 to age 33 longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 484-492.

Walters, J., & Gardiner, H. (1992). The crystallizing experience: Discovering an intellectual gift. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (2nd ed., pp. 135-155). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1986)

Wiener, N. (1976). The autobiography of an ex-prodigy. In W. W. Dennis & M. Dennis (Eds.), The intellectually gifted (pp. 69-83). New York: Grune & Stratton. (Original work published 1953)

Wiener, N. (1976). The case of W. J. Sidis. In W. W. Dennis & M. Dennis (Eds.), The intellectually gifted (pp. 85-87). New York: Grune & Stratton. (Original work published 1953)

Winner, E. (1996). Gifted children: Myths and realities. New York: BasicBooks.

Winner, E. (2000). The origins and ends of giftedness. American Psychologist, 55, 159-169.

Additional readings: Roeper Review: A Journal on Gifted Education, Gifted Child Quarterly, and Journal of Creative Behavior.

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 20. DEVELOPMENT II: FAMILY ENVIRONMENT Albert, R. S. (1983). Family positions and the attainment of eminence. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 141-154). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1980)

Berrington, H. (1983). Prime ministers and the search for love. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 358-373). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1974)

Carlsmith, L. (1976). Effects of early rather absence on scholastic aptitude. In W. W. Dennis & M. Dennis (Eds.), The intellectually gifted (pp. 99-117). New York: Grune & Stratton. (Original work published 1964)

Downey, D. B. (2001). Number of siblings and intellectual development: The resource dilution explanation. American Psychologist, 56, 497-504.

Eiduson, B. T. (1983). Early influences on research scientists. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 182-202). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1973)

Eisenstadt, J. M. (1978). Parental loss and genius. American Psychologist, 33, 211-223.

Goertzel, V., & Goertzel, M. G. (1962). Cradles of eminence. Boston: Little, Brown.

Goertzel, M. G., Goertzel, V. & Goertzel, T. G. (1978). 300 eminent personalities: A psychosocial analysis of the famous. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Harrington, D. M., Block, J. H., & Block, J. (1992). Testing aspects of Carl Roger’s theory of creative environments: Child-rearing antecedents of creative potential in young adolescents. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (2nd ed., pp. 195-208). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1987)

Kerr, B., & Chopp, C. (1999). Families and creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 709-715). San Diego: Academic Press.

Laband, D. N., & Lentz, B. F. (1992). Why children follow in the parents’ career footsteps. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (2nd ed., pp. 171-174). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1985)

Monsaas, J. A., & Engelhard, G., Jr. (1992). Home environment and the competitiveness of highly accomplished individuals in four talent fields. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence(2nd ed., pp. 253-263). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1990)

McCurdy, H. G. (1983). The childhood pattern of genius. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 155-169). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1960)

Roe, A. (1983). Early background of eminent scientists. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 170-181). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1953)

Rothenberg, A., & Wyshak, G. (2004). Family background and genius. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 49, 185-191.

Simonton, D. K. (2008). Bilingualism and creativity. In  J. Altarriba & R. R. Heredia (Eds.), An introduction to bilingualism:  Principles and processes (pp. 147-166). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Simonton, D. K. (2008). Gender differences in birth order and family size among 186 eminent psychologists. Journal of Psychology of Science and Technology, 1, 15-22.

Simonton, D. K. (2008). Scientific talent, training, and performance: Intellect, personality, and genetic endowment. Review of General Psychology, 12, 28-46.

Steinberg, B. S. (2001). The making of female presidents and prime ministers: The impact of birth order, sex of siblings, and father-daughter dynamics. Political Psychology, 22, 89-110.

Sulloway, F. J. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York: Pantheon.

Sulloway, F. J. (1999). Birth order. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 189-202). San Diego: Academic Press.

Sulloway, F. J. (2010). Why siblings are like Darwin’s Finches: Birth order, sibling competition, and adaptive divergence within the family. In D. M. Buss & P. H. Hawley (Eds.), The Evolution of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 86-119). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Von Károlyi, C., Winner, E., Gray, W., & Sherman, G. F. (2003). Dyslexia linked to talent: Global visual-spatial ability. Brain and Language, 85, 427-431.

Walberg, H. J., Rasher, S. P., & Parkerson, J. (1980). Childhood and eminence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 13, 225-231.

Weber, P. J. (1984). The birth order oddity in Supreme Court appointments. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 14, 561-568.

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 21. DEVELOPMENT III: EDUCATION Balchin, T., Hymer, B., & Matthews, D. T. (Eds.). (2009). The Routledge international companion to gifted education. London: Routledge.

Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.). (2010). Nurturing creativity in the classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bishop, W. E. (1976). Characteristics of teachers judged successful by intellectually gifted, high achieving high school students. In W. W. Dennis & M. Dennis (Eds.), The intellectually gifted (pp. 141-152). New York: Grune & Stratton. (Original work published 1975)

Cropley, A. J. (1997). Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 83-114). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Cropley, A. J. (1999). Education. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 629-642). San Diego: Academic Press.

Dogan, M. (1999). Marginality. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 179-184). San Diego: Academic Press.

Gallagher, J. J (1976). The gifted child in elementary school. In W. W. Dennis & M. Dennis (Eds.), The intellectually gifted (pp. 119-140). New York: Grune & Stratton. (Original work published 1959)

Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 86, 148-161.

Parnes, S. J. (1970). Education and creativity. In P. E. Vernon (Ed.), Creativity (pp. 341-354). Baltimore: Penguin. (Original work published 1963)

Reynolds, M. C., Birch, J. W., & Tuseth, A. A. (1976). Research on early admissions. In W. W. Dennis & M. Dennis (Eds.), The intellectually gifted (pp. 165-177). New York: Grune & Stratton. (Original work published 1962)

Ripple, R. E. (1999). Teaching creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 629-638). San Diego: Academic Press.

Runco, M. A., & Charles, R. E. (1997). Developmental trends in creative potential and creative performance. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 115-152). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creative development as acquired expertise: Theoretical issues and an empirical test. Developmental Review, 20, 283-318.

Stanley, J. C. (1976). Accelerating the educational progress of intellectually gifted children. In W. W. Dennis & M. Dennis (Eds.), The intellectually gifted (pp. 179-196). New York: Grune & Stratton. (Original work published 1973)

Sumption, M. R., Norris, D., & Terman, L. M. (1976). Special education for the gifted child. In W. W. Dennis & M. Dennis (Eds.), The intellectually gifted (pp. 153-164). New York: Grune & Stratton. (Original work published 1950)

Torrance, E. P. (1970). Causes for concern. In P. E. Vernon (Ed.), Creativity (pp. 355-370). Baltimore: Penguin. (Original work published 1962)

Weisberg, R. W. (1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 226-250). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zuckerman, H. (1983). The scientific elite: Nobel laureates’ mutual influences. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 241-252). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1979)

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 22. DEVELOPMENT IV: SOCIAL CONTEXT Blaha, S. (2002). The life cycle of civilizations. Auburn, NH: Pingree-Hill.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 190-212). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Dugosh, K. L., Paulus, P. B., Roland, E. J., & Yang, H.-C. (2000) Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 722-735.

Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. In T. B. Ward & S. M. Smith (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 461-493). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Gray, C. E. (1958). An analysis of Graeco-Roman development: The epicyclical evolution of Graeco-Roman civilization. American Anthropologist, 60, 13-31.

Gray, C. E. (1961). An epicyclical model for Western civilization. American Anthropologist, 63, 1014-1037.

Gray, P. H. (1992). Hereditary Genius revisited: Were Galton’s missing scientists the aftermath of the Puritan brain drain to America? In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (2nd ed., pp. 129-134). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1983)

Harrington, D. M. (1990). The econology of human creativity: A psychological perspective. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 143-169). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Harrison, A. A., Struthers, N. J., & Moore, M. (1988). On the conjunction of national holidays and reported birthdates: One more path to reflected glory? Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 365-370.

Kroeber, A. (1944). Configurations of culture growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Leung, A. K., Maddux, W. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Chiu, C. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. American Psychologist, 63, 169-181.

Murray, C. (2003). Human accomplishment: The pursuit of excellence in the arts and sciences, 800 B.C. to 1950. New York: HarperCollins.

Naroll, R., Benjamin, E. C., Fohl, F. K., Fried, M. J., Hildreth, R. E., & Schaefer, J. M. (1971). Creativity: A cross-historical pilot survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2, 181-188.

Nemeth, C. J., Personnaz, B., Personnaz, M., & Goncalo, J. A. (2004). The liberating role of conflict in group creativity: A study in two countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 365-374.

Norling, B. (1970). Timeless problems in history. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame Press.

Simonton, D. K. (1984). Generational time-series analysis: A paradigm for studying sociocultural influences. In K. Gergen & M. Gergen (Eds.), Historical social psychology (pp. 139-155). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Simonton, D. K. (1992). Gender and genius in Japan: Feminine eminence in masculine culture. Sex Roles, 27, 101-119.

Simonton, D. K. (1992). The social context of career success and course for 2,026 scientists and inventors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 452-463.

Simonton, D. K. (1996). Individual genius and cultural configurations: The case of Japanese civilization. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 354-375.

Simonton, D. K. (1997). Sociocultural context of individual creativity: A transhistorical time-series analysis. In D. K. Simonton, Genius and creativity: Selected papers (pp. 3-28). Greenwich, CT: Ablex. (Original work published 1975)

Simonton, D. K. (1983). History and the eminent person. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 233-240). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1978)

Simonton, D. K. (1997). Galtonian genius, Kroeberian configurations, and emulation: A generational time-series analysis of Chinese civilization. In D. K. Simonton, Genius and creativity: Selected papers (pp. 55-78). Greenwich, CT: Ablex. (Original work published 1988)

Simonton, D. K. (2003). Creative cultures, nations, and civilizations: Strategies and results. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 304-328). New York: Oxford University Press.

Simonton, D. K. (2003). Kroeber’s cultural configurations, Sorokin’s culture mentalities, and generational time-series analysis: A quantitative paradigm for the comparative study of civilizations. Comparative Civilizations Review, 49, 96-108.

Simonton, D. K. (2004). Creative clusters, political fragmentation, and cultural heterogeneity: An investigative journey though civilizations East and West. In P. Bernholz & R. Vaubel (Eds.), Political competition, innovation and growth in the history of Asian civilizations (pp. 39-56). Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar.

Simonton, D. K., & Ting, S.-S. (2010). Creativity in Eastern and Western civilizations: The lessons of historiometry. Management and Organization Review, 6, 329-350.

Sorokin, P. A., & Merton, R. K. (1935). The course of Arabian intellectual development, 700-1300 A.D. Isis, 22, 516-524.

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 23. GENIUS VS. ZEITGEIST I: ART Barry, H. (1957). Relationships between child training and the pictorial arts. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 54, 380-383.

Dressler, W. W., & Robbins, M. C. (1975). Art styles, social stratification, and cognition: An analysis of Greek vase painting. American Ethnologist, 2, 427-434.

Dudek, S. Z. (1999). Architecture, modern Western. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 79-89). San Diego: Academic Press.

Hasenfus, N., Martindale, C., & Birnbaum, D. (1983). Psychological reality of cross-media artistic styles. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 841-863.

Kavolis, V. (1963). Political dynamics and artistic creativity. Sociology and Social Research, 49, 412-424.

Kavolis, V. (1964). Economic correlation of artistic creativity. American Journal of Sociology, 70, 332-341.

Kavolis, V. (1966). Community dynamics and artistic creativity. American Sociological Review, 31, 208-217.

Lang, G. E., & Lang, K. (1988). Recognition and renown: The survival of artistic reputation. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 79-109.

Martindale, C. (1976). Primitive mentality and the relationship between art and society. Scientific Aesthetics, 1, 5-18.

Martindale, C. (1986). The evolution of Italian painting: A quantitative investigation of trends in style and content from late Gothic to the Rococo period. Leonardo, 19, 217-222.

Martindale, C. (1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic styles. New York: Basic Books.

Mulkay, M., & Chaplin, E. (1982). Aesthetics and the artistic career: A study of anomie in fine-art painting. Sociological Quarterly, 23, 117-138.

Rothenberg, A. (1986). Artistic creation as stimulated by superimposed versus combined-composite visual images. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 370-381.

Simonton, D. K. (1997). Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and within generations. In D. K. Simonton, Genius and creativity: Selected papers (pp. 29-54). Greenwich, CT: Ablex. (Original work published 1984)

Sorokin, P. A. (1957). Social and cultural dynamics: A study of change in major systems of art, truth, ethics, law and social relationships (rev. & abridged). Boston: Porter Sargent, chaps. 7-10.

Winner, E. (1982). Invented worlds: The psychology of the arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 24. GENIUS VS. ZEITGEIST II: LITERATURE Helson, R. (1978). The imaginative process in children’s literature: A quantitative approach. Poetics, 7, 135-153.

Helson, R. (1980). Challenger and upholder syndromes in critics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 825-838.

Martindale, C. (1973). An experimental simulation of literary change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 319-326.

Martindale, C. (1975). Romantic progression: The psychology of literary history. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

Martindale, C. (1984). The evolution of aesthetic taste. In K. J. Gergen & M. M. Gergen (Eds.), Historical social psychology (pp. 347-370). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Martindale, C. (1986). Aesthetic evolution. Poetics, 15, 439-473.

Martindale, C. (Ed.). (1988). Psychological approaches to the study of literary narratives. Hamburg: Buske.

Martindale, C. (1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic styles. New York: Basic Books.

Martindale, C. (1999). History and creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 823-830). San Diego: Academic Press.

Martindale, C. (2009). The evolution and end of art as Hegelian tragedy. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 27, 133-140.

Niu, W., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Creativity in troubled times: Factors associated with recognitions of Chinese literary creativity in the 20th century. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 57-67.

Piirto, J. (1999). Poetry. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 409-415). San Diego: Academic Press.

Porter, C. A., & Suedfeld, P. (1981). Integrative complexity in the correspondence of literary figures: Effects of personal and societal stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 321-330.

Rosenberg, S. (1989). A study of personality in literary autobiography: An analysis of Thomas Wolfe’s Look Homeward, Angel. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 416-430.

Rosenberg, S., & Jones, R. A. (1972). A method for investigating and representing a person’s implicit personality theory: Theodore Dreiser’s view of people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 372-386.

Schmidt, S. J. (Ed.). (1981). Empirical studies in literature. Poetics, 10, 317-336.

Simonton, D. K. (2004). Thematic content and political context in Shakespeare’s dramatic output, with implications for authorship and chronology controversies. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 201-213.

Sorokin, P. A. (1957). Social and cultural dynamics: A study of change in major systems of art, truth, ethics, law and social relationships (rev. & abridged). Boston: Porter Sargent.

See also articles in Poetics.

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 25. GENIUS VS. ZEITGEIST III: PHILOSOPHY Doty, R. M., Peterson, B. E., & Winter, D. G. (1991). Threat and authoritarianism in the United States, 1978-1987. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 629-640.

Klingemann, H.-D., Mohler, P. P., & Weber, R. P. (1982). Cultural indicators based on content analysis: A secondary analysis of Sorokin’s data on fluctuations of systems of truth. Quality and Quantity, 16, 1-18.

Kuo, Y.-Y. (1986). The growth and decline of Chinese philosophical genius. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 28, 81-91.

Kuo, Y.-Y. (1988). The social psychology of Chinese philosophical creativity: A critical syntesis. Social Epistemology, 2, 283-295.

McCann, S. J. H., & Stewin, L. L. (1984). Environmental threat and parapsychological contributions to the psychological literature. Journal of Social Psychology, 122, 227-235.

Padgett, V., & Jorgenson, D. O. (1982). Superstition and economic threat: Germany 1918-1940. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 736-741.

Sales, S. M. (1972). Economic threat as a determinant of conversion rates in authoritarian and non-authoritarian churches. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 420-428.

Sales, S. M. (1973). Threat as a factor in authoritarianism: An analysis of archival data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 44-57.

Simonton, D. K. (1976). Do Sorokin’s data support his theory?: A study of generational fluctuations in philosophical beliefs. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 15, 187-198.

Simonton, D. K. (1976). Philosophical eminence, beliefs, and zeitgeist: An individual-generational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 630-640.

Simonton, D. K. (1978). Intergenerational stimulation, reaction, and polarization: A causal analysis of intellectual history. Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 247-251.

Simonton, D. K. (2000). Methodological and theoretical orientation and the long-term disciplinary impact of 54 eminent psychologists. Review of General Psychology, 4, 13-24.

Sorokin, P. A. (1957). Social and cultural dynamics: A study of change in major systems of art, truth, ethics, law and social relationships (rev. & abridged). Boston: Porter Sargent, part. 3.

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 26. GENIUS VS. ZEITGEIST IV: SCIENCE Días de Chumaceiro, C. L. (1999). Serendipity. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 543-549). San Diego: Academic Press.

Dunbar, K. (1999). Science. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 525-531). San Diego: Academic Press.

Ione, A. (1999). Multiple discovery. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 261-271). San Diego: Academic Press.

Jackson, D. N., & Rushton, J. P. (Eds.). (1987). Scientific excellence: Origins and assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Kantorovich, A., (1993). Scientific discovery: Logic and tinkering. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Lamb, D., & Easton, S. M. (1984). Multiple discovery. England: Avebury.

Mansfield, R. S., & Busse, T. V. (1981). The psychology of creativity and discovery: Scientists and their work. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

Merton, R. K. (1961). Singletons and multiples in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 105, 470-486.

Merton, R. K. (1983). Behavior patterns of scientists. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 253-261). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1973)

Messerli, P. (1988). Age differences in the reception of new scientific theories: The case of plate tectonics theory. Social Studies of Science, 18, 91-112.

Patinkin, D. (1983). Multiple discoveries and the central message. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 306-323.

Price, D. (1978). Ups and downs in the pulse of science and technology. In J. Gaston (Ed.), The sociology of science (pp. 162-171). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Rainoff, T. J. (1929). Wave-like fluctuations of creative productivity in the development of West-European physics in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Isis, 12, 287-319.

Simonton, D. K. (1997). Leaders of American psychology, 1879-1967: Career development, creative output, and professional achievement. In D. K. Simonton, Genius and creativity: Selected papers (pp. 157-190). Greenwich, CT: Ablex. (Original work published 1992)

Simonton, D. K. (2000). Methodological and theoretical orientation and the long-term disciplinary impact of 54 eminent psychologists. Review of General Psychology, 4, 1-13.

Simonton, D. K. (2002). Great psychologists and their times: Scientific insights into psychology’s history. Washington, DC: APA Books.

Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, process, and person perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 475-494.

Simonton, D. K. (2004). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Simonton, D. K. (2004). Psychology’s status as a scientific discipline: Its empirical placement within an implicit hierarchy of the sciences. Review of General Psychology, 8, 59-67.

Simonton, D. K. (2006). Scientific status of disciplines, individuals, and ideas: Empirical analyses of the potential impact of theory. Review of General Psychology, 10, 98-112.

Stent, G. S. (1972). Prematurity and uniqueness in scientific discovery. Scientific American, 227, 84-93.

Taylor, C. W., & Barron, F. (Eds.). (1963). Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development. New York: Wiley.

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 27. GENIUS VS. ZEITGEIST V: POLITICS Cohen, J. E. (2003). The polls: Presidential greatness as seen in the mass public: An extension and application of the Simonton model. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 33, 913-924.

Emrich, C. G., Brower, H. H., Feldman, J. M., & Garland, H. (2001). Images in words: Presidential rhetoric, charisma, and greatness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 527-557.

Etheredge, L. S. (1978). Personality effects on American foreign policy, 1898-1968: A test of interpersonal generalization theory. American Political Science Review, 78, 434-451.

Feldman, O. & Valenty, L. O. (Eds.). (2001). Profiling political leaders: Cross-cultural studies of personality and behavior. Westport, CT: Praeger.

House, R. J., Spangler, W. D., & Woycke, J. (1991). Personality and charisma in the U.S. presidency: A psychological theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 364-396.

Kowert, P. A. (1996). Where does the buck stop?: Assessing the impact of presidential personality. Psychological Psychology, 17, 421-452.

Ludwig, A. M. (2002). King of the mountain: The nature of political leadership. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.

O’Connor, J., Mumford, M. D., Clifton, T. C., Gessner, T. L., & Connelly, M. S. (1995). Charismatic leaders and destructiveness: An historiometric study. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 529-555.

Post, J. M. (Ed.). (2003). The psychological assessment of political leaders: With profiles of Saddam Hussein and Bill Clinton. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Rubenzer, S. J., & Faschingbauer, T. R. (2004). Personality, character, & leadership in the White House: Psychologists assess the presidents. Washington, DC: Brassey's.

Simonton, D. K. (1986). Presidential personality: Biographical use of the Gough Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 149-160.

Simonton, D. K. (1987). Why presidents succeed: A political psychology of leadership. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Simonton, D. K. (1988). Presidential style: Personality, biography, and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 928-936.

Simonton, D. K. (1990). Personality and politics. In L. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality (pp. 670-692). New York: Guilford.

Simonton, D. K. (2001). Kings, queens, and sultans: Empirical studies of political leadership in European hereditary monarchies. In O. Feldman & L. O. Valenty (Eds.), Profiling political leaders: Cross-cultural studies of personality and behavior (pp. 97-110). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Simonton, D. K. (2008). Presidential greatness and its socio-psychological significance: Individual or situation? Performance or attribution? In C. Hoyt, G. R. Goethals, & D. Forsyth (Eds.), Leadership at the crossroads: Vol. 1. Psychology and leadership (pp. 132-148). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Simonton, D. K. (2010). Personality and leadership. In R. A. Couto (Ed.), Political and civic leadership (Vol. 2, pp. 631-639). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Sorokin, P. A. (1925). Monarchs and rulers: A comparative statistical study. I. Social Forces, 4, 22-35.

Sorokin, P. A. (1926). Monarchs and rulers: A comparative statistical study. II. Social Forces, 4, 523-533.

Suedfeld, P., Corteen, R. S., & McCormick, C. (1986). The role of integrative complexity in military leadership: Robert E. Lee and his opponents. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 498-507.

Suedfeld, P., & Rank, A. D. (1976). Revolutionary leaders: Long-term success as a function of changes in conceptual complexity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 169-178.

Suedfeld, P., & Tetlock, P. (1977). Integrative complexity of communications in international crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21, 169-184.

Suedfeld, P., Tetlock, P. E., & Ramirez, C. (1977). War, peace, and integrative complexity. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21, 427-442.

Tetlock, P. E. (1979). Identifying victims of groupthink from public statements of decision makers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1314-1324.

Winter, D. G. (1987). Leader appeal, leader performance, and the motive profiles of leaders and followers: A study of American presidents and elections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 196-202.

Winter, D. G. (1993). Power, affiliation, and war: Three tests of a motivational model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,65, 532-545.

Woods, F. A. (1913). The influence of monarchs. New York: Macmillan.

To top
Return to Lectures page




Lecture 28. CREATIVITY AND LEADERSHIP: FINAL INQUIRIES Albert, R. S. (Ed.). (1983). Genius and eminence. Oxford: Pergamon.

Arieti, S. (1976). Creativity: The magic synthesis. New York: Basic Books.

Austin, J. H. (1978). Chase, chance and creativity. New York: Columbia University Press.

Campbell, D. T., & Tauscher, H. (1966). Schopenhauer (?), Séguin, Lubinoff, and Zehender as anticipators of Emmert’s Law: With comments on the uses of eponymy. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 2, 58-63.

Csikszentmihalhi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313-338). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Davis, G. A. (1999). Barriers to creativity and creative attitudes. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 165-174). San Diego: Academic Press.

Ehrenwald, J. (1984). The anatomy of genius: Split brains and global minds. New York: Human Sciences.

Gruber, H. E. (1985). Giftedness and moral responsibility: Creative thinking and human survival. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O’Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 301-330). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J., & Hogan, J. (1994). What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 49, 493-504.

Kasof, J. (1999). Attribution and creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 147-156). San Diego: Academic Press.

Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2002). Could Steven Spielberg manage the Yankees?: Creative thinking in different domains. Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 12, 5-14.

Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 392-430). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Paulus, P. B. (1999). Group creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 779-784). San Diego: Academic Press.

Shekerjian, D. (1989). Uncommon genius. New York: Viking.

Simonton, D. K. (1992). Personality correlates of exceptional personal influence: A note on Thorndike’s (1950) creators and leaders. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (2nd ed., pp. 269-279). Oxford: Pergamon. (Original work published 1991)

Simonton, D. K. (2010). Creativity in highly eminent individuals. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 174-188). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Group creativity: Music, theater, collaboration. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Sorokin, P. A. (1957). Social and cultural dynamics: A study of change in major systems of art, truth, ethics, law and social relationships (rev. & abridged). Boston: Porter Sargent.

Turner, S. P., & Chubin, D. E. (1979). Chance and eminence in science: Ecclesiastes II. Social Science Information, 18, 437-449.

To top
Return to Lectures page


Last Revised: September 22, 2012.